JOB TIPS: Three things to do if you’re comms and PR and worried about redundancy

There’s growing uncertainty in post-lockdown Britain and comms and PR people are feeling vulnerable.

The shadow of the first wave of COVID-19 deaths recedes replaced by the fear of job losses.

If you’re feeling exposed and fear redundancy I know how that feels.

Back in the early 1990s two weeks into my working life that was me and it taught me three important things.

Back then, I was working on a newspaper as a dark room technician trying to pay off University debt while working out what I wanted to do with my life. Two weeks in, we were all called into a meeting to be told that the paper was being put up for sale and there may not be enough money to pay the wages.

That was compulsory redundancy.

Six years ago when I left to become freelance it was voluntary but the lessons I learned still applied.

The redundancy process is always painful but when properly applied is equitable. When badly applied it causes resentment and blows the organisation’s credibility.

Here’s what I learned.

There will be rumours. Stop listening to them.

“I’ve heard that X met Y and they say that Z is going to happen.”

From experience, you’ll hear all sorts. Almost all of it will be supposition, rumour and speculation. All of it becomes tiring.

I eventually made the conscious decision to stop listening for the good of my mental health.

Wait for official communication

This is the picture and it’ll happen by X.”

I found it far easier to ignore the rumour and wait for official communication and a chance to ask questions.

While you’re waiting…

Join a union

“They may tell you X but that’s wrong. Y is what they need to do and Z is the law to cite.”

It is so useful to have someone in your corner and who can spell out to you what the process is in law.

I’ve been a member of the National Union of Journalists for the past 25 years. They represent PR and communications. You can get more information here.

My Mum used to say that one door closes and another opens up. If you’re in the middle of the storm you won’t see this. I get that. This only comes with hindsight. It’s not a nice feeling to have your job under threat and I don’t dismiss that lightly but I hope one day you see a silver lining to it all.

Good luck.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

COVID COMMS #21: People are sharing official messages less, so what can you do?

Fewer people are sharing COVID-19 safety messages and that’s a problem for public sector people.

According to Ofcom research, 25 per cent of people were sharing key messages at the start of the pandemic but 12 weeks in that figure has halved.

Anecdotally, there’s a range of reasons for this. Message fatigue. Lockdown fatigue. Falling trust in politicians. Debate over the messaging. Confusion. But why is less important than the ‘what next?’

That’s a real problem if you are a public sector communicator charged with reaching people.

If this whole episode has proved anything its that the communicator who churns the same stuff out without thinking has had their day.

So what to do?

Back when I was on newspapers in the late 90s the answer to falling circulation was to do more of the same. Only much more. That was the wrong answer then and its the wrong answer now.

Here’s five things you can do to better get the message through to people.

Educate the client. The landscape is changing rapidly. What worked five weeks ago let alone five years ago are two different things. Pay extra double close attention to research like Ofcom’s and educate the senior leadership team as to why you are doing what you do. It doesn’t have to be extensive. Just something that spells out why you are working how you’re working. This is so very important.

Create your own content. Data has suggested that people are getting fed-up with politicians and the Government. So, try making your own assets with local messages that mirror the national picture.

Take your own content to where the audience is. I know, I know. I’ve been banging on about this for a long time. Create content for Dudley and knock on the doors of Dudley Facebook groups. People are more likely to trust messages from people who look and sound like them.

Nurses and Doctors to the front. Trust in the NHS remains sky high. Nine out of 10 people trust medics. So have local medics fronting your content.

Advertise. If people won’t naturally share your content put some money behind it. That way it’ll reach people.

Work with your local news brand. Newsrooms are getting thinner at the time when people trust local news more. So, talk to them about what would work with them. A video? A Facebook Live with a public health officer? Have that conversation. It’s about reaching people.

Remember that your staff are your biggest assets. Remember that? So, use them. Have a network of people who are prepared to share your public health message. Connect them via email or Workplace or Yammer or whatever the best way to connect them is.

Pay really close attention to your own insights and data. What’s working locally? As people’s experiences change and alter your own insights will be a useful barometer over what is working. It’s less ‘is it visible?’ and far more ‘has anyone seen it and acted upon it?’ Box ticking presenteeism in your comms is of no use to anyone. Least of all now.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

COVID COMMS #20: Liverpool City Council and their video response to football fans gathering at Pier Head

When Liverpool won the Premier League after a 30 year wait the red part were happy, the blue part were sad and public sector people held their breath.

In pre-COVID-19 days the win would have been greeted by a huge outpouring of emotion on the streets. Three quarters of a million supporters greeted the Reds’ European Cup win last year.

But with restrictions there was an anxiety that people would forget the public health advice.

Media reports and social media saw smaller gatherings at Anfield and elsewhere when Chelsea beat Manchester City 2-1 on the Thursday evening and gave the Reds and unassailable points total but it was to Pier Head that thousands turned to celebrate on Friday.

The afternoon saw the Pier Head turned into the site of an overly indulged festival with beer cans and other debris strewn.

Jennifer Bruce, Liverpool City Council’s video journalist, joined the weekly Zoom session of Public Sector Comms Headspace where she shared key learning.

I’ve blogged some of the key points with her permission.

While Liverpool FC’s title win was good for the city the Pier Head celebrations and their aftermath threatened to be deeply damaging. Celebrations for some supporters were also a public health nightmare in a pandemic. The council in its response was faced with a difficult challenge.

Jen shot footage of the celebrations from the city council’s offices in the Cunard Building. But when the celebrations started to get out of hand she retreated.

She then shot footage in the morning of the state of Pier Head to help explain the challenge the city council now faced. The fans’ litter made the city look a mess.

Look for the heroes. Jen shot footage of city council staff who were clearing up but also individual fans too who had come down to clear away the mess. They were the individual heroes and by telling their story she could tell the wider story. That’s such a brilliant piece of advice and chimes with the idea of looking for a human face.

By mid-morning the next day, Liverpool FC, the council and Merseyside Police released a joint statement condemning the behaviour at the Pier Head. The council speaking alone wouldn’t have cut through. All three together were needed and the statement text here was picked up by the regional and national media. The move served to help head off any future celebrations. The swiftness of the statement was as a result of good working relationships built-up over months.

There is a value to creating and posting content swiftly. Footage of the celebrations and the morning after were posted quickly. A long sign-off process would have hindered this.

Video worksThe footage was widely viewed on the council’s own social media assets. More than 2.5 million people saw the footage on Twitter and there were 23,000 engagements.

Team work works. It was heartening to hear how the Liverpool City Council team all rallied around to help.

Subtitles work. Even in a short turn-around the council put subtitles on their video to extend reach and make them more accessible.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

COVID COMMS #19: Comms lessons from the Bournemouth beach major incident

When the history of the pandemic gets written there’s sure to be a paragraph on the hundreds of thousands of people who headed to Bournemouth to enjoy a sunny day by the sea.

Quite how the town coped is anyone’s guess but it was a real delight to hear Rachael Mills‘ account. The PR and communications manager at Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council gave some key learning from during a Zoom chat for members of the Public Sector Comms Headspace Facebook group.

It’s absolutely clear that Rachel and the rest of the council team and other public sector communicators in the town performed heroics with long hours over a number of days.

With her permission, here are some of the key points of learning.

As the numbers unfolded, one of the first steps was to turn social channels into broadcast channels. Normally, the council is responsive to question and comment but as the situation unfolded the queries were outstripping the ability to answer them.

As the media queries escalated a system of triage was introduced. As the world’s media rang, there wasn’t enough capacity to answer all of the questions and interview requests straight away. A triage system allowed the council to prioritise those media companies who were most important.

As the media queries flooded in, the one talking head needed extra help. The council Leader won credit for their handling of the situation and calmness in answering questions. They were backed-up on the ground with council staff who maintained social distancing but helped marshall the media requests.

A second briefed interviewee would have been handy. The main spokesperson played a blinder but the the organisation needs to have some capacity for someone else to take the slack.

Comms channels on the ground came into their own. Town centre LED messageboards became an important part of the equation as the council tried to communicate with people.

As a community that relies on tourism there were two audiences, visitors and residents. Channels to talk to residents were used to speak with residents. With residents there was an awful lot of myth-busting to be done. Channels for visitors delivered messages to visitors.

Good relationships built in peacetime can bear fruit in a time of crisis. The council had good links with the Local Resilience Forum and others that had been built up over months. When a real emergency happened those relationships were already in place.

For staffing, people were reserved to be the early shift and the late shift. There was no sense in letting everyone run at the issue at the same time. Some resource had to be kept back.

A thread of tweets from a personal account really cut through. Rachael used her own Twitter account to write the explanation of what the council had done and why. By using her account she put a human face on the issue.

Picture credit: Documerica / Flickr

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

COVID COMMS #18: Swift local Facebook content is the way to challenge misinformation

The battle against misinformation will be won and lost on Facebook.

It is the largest social media platform in the world with more than 49 million users in the UK. It is where people go for news, gossip, family pictures and to kill time.

This week the Daily Express ran a piece proclaiming the English towns on the verge of local lockdown. It led to a forest fire of rumour circulating with Facebook groups as the driver.

It’s easy for public sector communications people to feel swamped in the face of a sea of rumour and often hostile comment. It’s braver to stand up and challenge.

Take the case of Wigan in the North West of England.

Facebook case study: Wigan

Research I’ve carried out would suggest that every person who lives in Wigan would be a member of three Facebook groups.

I’ve chosen three Facebook groups to map the activity.

Three groups were chosen. I’m From Wigan with 41,000 members, WiganNow with 16,200 members and the Im From Wigan group (note no apostrophe) with 1,700 members.

Compared to the groups is Wigan Council’s page with 39,000 likes. in a borough of 318,000 which works out at a more than healthy 12 per cent. The health warning is of course that not all the council’s page audience will see an update.

Fig 1. Wigan Facebook audience: Three Facebook groups and the council page.

Visual content gets shared as misinformation

All had content shared from the Daily Express link.

Visual misinformation will travel as an image, a meme or a link. Sometimes it is deliberately created or shared knowing it is false. This is disinformation. At other times it is just plain incorrect which is misinformation. The Daily Express story.

A version of the Daily Express story was posted into the three Wigan groups:

Creating shareable Facebook content as rebuttal

Hats off Wigan Council. They created sharable content on Facebook with quotes from Kate Adern Wigan Council’s director of public health denying that Wigan was under imminent threat of lockdown.

The content had a human face.

The content had a clear message.

There was a clear call to action – a request for people to share it.

Within hours the content had found its way into the three Wigan Facebook groups and much further afield too. In little over 24-hours the rebuttal content had been shared a stocky 6,300 times.

The Wigan content was factual and relied on trust in experts.

The borough’s Public Health expert played the role of Chris Whitty and politicians were nowhere to be seen. This is exactly the right balance to take when talking to an audience. Politicians as a group are not as strongly trusted as medical experts sdo it was right to quote the expert.

Wigan Council’s content was shared in Wigan groups

Each of the three Wigan groups saw people sharing council content. Of the five pieces of council rebuttal in the three groups, three were screenshots of the message and two were links.

While a council can create accessible content on its page that can be read by screen readers the reality is what works across wider Facebook isn’t that. It’s images and memes.

That’s the content that the public sector should be creating.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

COVID COMMS #17: If you’re trying to reach people with COVID-19 messages this research is absolutely essential

There’s this footage of a tsunami sweeping through a Japanese port that’s both horrifying and mundane.

It’s shot from a hill that looks down on the port. You see the wave slowly sweep in. At first what’s odd is the boats it brings with it. Great big trawlers as well as little pleasure boats crunching into seafront streets.

Then as the wave barrel;s through the town the wooden buildings begin to detach and move too swept bu the force of the slow-moving wave. What was a fixture is now moving in front of your eyes.

A similar effect is happening to the media landscape over three months of pandemic. People’s habits have changed and fluctuated.

Ofcom have published magnificent work that traces through the last three months. For public sector communicators this research is life saving in every sense of the word and I suggest you spend a bit of time with it. The most recent research dates from mid-June which makes it helpfully contemporary.

Key points from the Ofcom research

People are voracious in their consumption of COVID-19 news but how much depends on how old they are. Ofcom stats show 89 per cent access news daily. Over 55-year-olds consume the most at 94 per cent. The lowest being 16 to 24-year-olds with 84 per cent.

A big minority of people try to avoid the news. Just over 33 per cent will try and avoid the news. I’m sure some are successful but others I think rather like the episode of ‘The Likely Lads’ end up accidentally accessing it.

Traditional media is trusted most. Over 55s at 96 per cent trust traditional media brands. Aged 25 to 34-year-olds trust traditional media least at 51 per cent.

Social media is getting used for news less as the pandemic has worn on. At the start, 49 per cent used networking sites which has dropped to 38 per cent after three months.

But hang on, social media use for younger people tops any other channel. For 16 to 24-year-olds social is where they’ll go to find out COVID-19 information. In that demographic, 63 per cent will go to social media that’s three times as many as over 65s.

People are sharing fewer COVID-19 messages. At the start of the pandemic 25 per cent were sharing NHS, public health or government messages. This has halved in 12-weeks. This on the face of it is alarming to public sector communicators. But for me, this flags up the need to be more creative in your communications. The straight forward share of the Government poster feels as though its less effective. So think of ways to engage. Would the message be more effective coming directly from a nurse? The town Public health officer? A doctor?

People are getting COVID-19 information less from closed networks like Messenger and WhatsApp. This has fallen from 34 per cent at the start to 18 per cent after three months.

Misinformation is rife but falling. At the start, 46 per cent saw falsehoods but this has dropped to 30 per cent after 12-weeks.

Confusion is on the rise. As things get more complicated and there is more noise and more rules across four nations of the UK its understandable that confusion grows. At the start this was 17 per cent and this has risen to 24 per cent.

We trust the NHS even more now than we did at the start. At the beginning, 90 per cent trusted the NHS and now 91 per cent do. This is significant.

So, what does this all mean?

It means that what was working 12-weeks ago may not be working now. It also means that a one size fits all approach is doomed. We kind of know that but here is the evidence for you to argue against that.

It also means that traditional news brands such as the BBC or the local paper are places where people go for trusted information. Except if you are younger. You’ll go to social media.

Public sector communicators are really earning their money at the moment. But long hours doesn’t necessarily mean effective communications.

There is need for a constant re-boot and re-assessment of what is being done locally. These national figures should be a canary in the mine. Use them as an indicator of a broad direction of travel but test them locally too.

Try and measure how effective things are and adjust as you go. But what’s most powerful in the figures is that the point to the fact that different demographics use different channels.

Picture credit: US Government National Archives

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

FACEBOOK PROTEST: What that means for the public sector

Facebook has been in the news of late with big brands announcing they’re suspending advertising with the platform.

The reason for with holding ad money is a perception that Mark Zuckerburg’s company has been seen to be tardy in cracking down on hate speech.

Starbucks, Microsoft, Adidas and North Face are amongst a list of global names who have have suspend their corporate spend.

So what does this mean for public sector comms?

UK public sector spending on Facebook is so tiny the debate is partly academic. Even if it acted as a sector the noise it would make would be tiny

Should it suspend advertising on the platform?

That’s a question for comms people looking to give advice. I’ve not heard of anyone from the public sector suspend advertising on Facebook.

Sure, there’s things to be unhappy about as far as it comes to Facebook. Some commentators have warned of the platform’s corrosive effect on democracy.

But for me, this is audience driven. If the audience is there advertise to them. If they’ve gone elsewhere go elsewhere.

For the most part, the audience of corporate public sector pages are women aged 35 to 55. I’m not convinced they are backing the cancel Facebook campaign.

But the underlying lesson is that nothing is permanent. For Facebook’s apparent dominance there are plenty of other media companies who have enjoyed then squandered a position of dominance.

Until there is a better way of sharing cat videos then Facebook is likely to be around for a while.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

30 days of human comms #69 South Warwickshire Foundation Trust’s letter to the children of staff

I’ve no doubt that historians will look back at this pandemic with wonder.

How did people cope? What did they do?

Often they’ll look at the big picture of the numbers and some key moments like the Prime Minister’s lockdown speech or they’ll look at fighting for toilet roll.

What they may miss is this. The period was 67 million stories of stress, bravery, boredom, frustration, grief, joy and tiredness. Every emotion, in fact.

Amongst those emotional stories are the children of key workers whose parents are doing key roles.

Step forward South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust. They’re not the first people to do this but they deserve credit for doing it. A letter home from the chief executive to the children of staff thanking them for supporting their parent.

It’s also written in very plain English ‘My name is Glen,’ it begins.

The danger of calling three months into the pandemic ‘the new normal’ is you stop caring so much about your internal comms.

This would be dangerous.

Sometimes internal comms isnt to communicate a strategy or directive but just to say ‘well done’ and ‘thank you.’ That’s a lovely human thing to do.

Bravo South Warwickshire NHS Trust.

And bravo Mum.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

DIGITAL NUMBERS: What public sector comms need to know about the 2020 Reuters Institute Digital News Report

There is nothing so terrible as activity without insight, Goethe once wrote.

A scientist and a poet the German would have been the ideal communicator mixing hard numbers with poetry that could make your heart sing.

Numbers and stories are what’s at the heart of the Reuters Institute for Journalism Digital News Report.

What does that matter to public sector communicators?

It matters for several reasons. Media relations remain an important plank of how any organisation communicates with its publics. But beyond that, there is such crossover between journalism and communications. Both sides are trying to make sense of the changing landscape.

The Reuters study gives a useful snapshot of how people are consuming news. While its a global study there is plenty of UK data.

What’s to learn from the Reuters study

Most people don’t care about local news. Less than a third of people in the UK rank themselves as interested in local news. Public sector takeout: Think of other ways to engage people.

In the UK, COVID-19 has affected news patterns. TV news is more popular, print has dropped even further. Public sector takeout: the old regime is changing even faster.

Five times as many people use WhatsApp than read a newspaper in print or online. This bit of detail is huge. So huge in fact that I’m going to post a link to my comms chums I’m in WhatsApp groups with. But I’ll need to read the WhatsApp’d link from my brother first. UK WhatsApp use is 56 per cent against a newspaper readership of nine per cent. Almost as many – seven per cent – deliberately use it for news. Public sector takeout: WhatsApp has really developed as a place where people consume. Organisations need to think of ways to use it effectively.

Closed groups are huge. In the UK during COVID-19, 51 per cent of people are using a closed Facebook group or a closed platform like Messenger or WhatsApp. Public sector takeout: How the public sector gets its messages into closed groups is a topic we’re only starting to wake-up to.

Facebook groups on their own are huge. Globally, almost a third – 31 per cent – use Facebook groups for local news and information. Public sector takeout: it’s not enough to ignore Facebook groups.

Overall, trust in news has fallen significantly. A drop of 12 per cent in 12 months is significant. Public sector takeout: Fewer people trust the news they consume.

The BBC remains the most trusted news brand in the UK. While its news rooms diminish its reputation still remains. A total of 64 per cent trusted the BBC just ahead of ITV news (60 per cent). The Sun is trusted by 16 per cent. Public sector takeout: time spent on TV or radio interviews is worthwhile.

Local news titles are strongly trusted. At 55 per cent the local newspaper sits just behind the BBC in terms of trust. That’s music to the ears of the remaining journalists. Public sector takeout: Those that consume it value it, the only problem is not enough are.

Local newspapers’ print edition reach nine per cent of the population. Less than a tenth of the population get news printed on newspaper. So, a borough of 100,000 will see less than 10,000 reading all about it. Public sector takeout: Print gets even less important.

Local newspapers’ website reaches nine per cent of the population. Just as many people go online for their local news than buy the edition at the news stand. Public sector takeout: Local news on the web is important.

Most people get their news online and social media and over a smartphone. Over the past seven years, the web has overtaken the once all-powerful TV and print as the place where people source their news. A total of 77 per cent get their headlines online. Public sector takeout: News needs to work online above all. Content that works on the web should trump everything. So, skills to create online content should trump press release writing ability.

Facebook dominates online news. A total of 24 per cent of the UK population get news from Mark Zuckerburg’s platform. Second largest is Twitter on 14 per cent and then in third place YouTube with seven per cent. Public sector takeout: Facebook is your news priority.

People don’t start with the news website. Battling over whether or not to put news on your homepage? Meh. Only 28 per cent head to an app or website. Public sector takeout: Stop stressing about news on the homepage. That’s not where people start their journey.

They trust the doctor not the politician. Doctors are trusted by 83 per cent, health organisations by 76 per cent, national government by 59 per cent and politicians by 35 per cent. Public sector takeout: The human being talking is a lot more effective than the cabinet member. This reinforces and updates what we already know.

Everyone is worried about misinformation but it’s whether you are left or right depends on who you blame. The left in the UK at 61 per cent blames politicians. That’s six times as many who blame journalists. On the right, the gap is closer with a 27 to 11 per cent lead for blaming politicians. Public sector takeout: It doesn’t matter if we are left or right, politicians are blamed most for misinformation.

Smart speakers are used for news by in the UK one in five. More use this than in other countries. Public sector take-out: Can your news reach people on a smart speaker?

News emails are used by 38 per cent in the UK. The average is three subscriptions. Public sector take-out: Hows your email content?

Young people aged 18 to 24 use Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok as a source of news during the pandemic. In the UK, 24 per cent went to Instagram pipping Snapchat on 19 per cent and TikTok on six per cent. Public sector takeout: if you want to talk to this demographic these three are important.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

RACE TIME: A useful starting point for equality in PR

It can only be good news that the CIPR has published research on black Asian and minority ethnic experience.

Commissioned almost 12-months ago and delayed by COVID-19 the Race in PR research lands at a time when equalities prompted by the death of George Floyd is in a long overdue.

The findings are stark.

Diversity has stalled and is reversing. In 2019, just eight per cent of PR people are from a diverse background a figure that had shrunk by three per cent in four years.

Not enough is being done. None of the 19 interviewed felt the industry is taking sufficient action to increase diversity.

Poor backgrounds. The research also showed that many people from minorities come from poorer backgrounds which is in itself a barrier to perceived ability to make connections and progress.

Independent. A poor experience has pointed people from minorities to become independent practitioners rather than proress up the corporate ladder.

Lack of fairness. Just six per cent said that ethnicities were treated fairly in the industry.

Unconscious bias. People often resort to stereotypes when they judge people which penalises people from minority backrounds.

Subtle digs. The report talks of ‘microaggressions’ which individually can be explained away but over time build-up. The unchallenged subtle racism of a client, for example.

“My dad had always said to me ‘Son, you’ll have to work twice as hard to get what the white man has got’. He wasn’t wrong! It certainly has felt like that in PR.”

Anonymous contributor, ‘race in pr’

Now, I approached this thinking I was the wrong person to be blogging about this. I’m a bloke and I’m white. After reading it, I still think I’m the wrong person but for different reasons. I’m not in a position of authority. But I do get that for things to change the whole industry needs to be prepared to change and that includes you and me.

Britain isn’t equal

During the #blacklivesmatters protests I was struck by a tweet from a campaigner thankin companies for their supportive tweet and then asking politely for a photograph of their senior leadership team to see how diverse that was.

But there is a big battle.

Britain is a place that hasn’t recovered from the Norman conquests and yes, I know they only occupied England and Wales. Norman names are 800 per cent more common at Oxford than the general population. Seventy per cent of the land is owned by 0.3 percent of the population. This is not an equal place.

It’s also a country that despite being rich in history buries it. Today, the leap is from the Tudors to the rise of fascism. I’m an English and History graduate. My knowledge of colonial Britain and slavery comes from reading around the subject not what I was taught in the classroom or in seminars.

In June 2020, at the height of protests race has never been higher as a priority but what happens when the news agenda changes and attention moves away? And what about gender equality? And equality for those from poorer backgrounds? They’re all part of the broader mix.

Can this be a start?

The research behind ‘Race in PR’ is based on 17 interviews with PR agency, in-house and independent practitioners. There appears to be no public sector involvement. I’d be keen too to know how geographically spread the interviewees are. That’s not to devalue the research. It’s hugely timely and a good starting point. But if we’re comms people we should be trying to get the best data possible and if 80 per cent of people in the UK live outside London I’d like to know what the picture there is too. If anything, I’d bet the problem is even worse in rural areas than in urban more diverse places.

But that quest for more data shouldn’t be an excuse for people in PR taking action and there are many steps are set out in the report and on the CIPR site. As the report says, what to do is pretty clear and set out. People just need to start to do it.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.