Dan Slee

Because you’re on the ball, you’ll know Meta are rolling out the biggest change to social media in decades.

Called Meta One, this subscription model brings in pay-to-play for pages for links and reach with basic prices starting at £150 a year rising to £5,000. For that you get one Facebook page, one Instagram account and one WhatsApp for Business account covered.

I’ve blogged how the changes that will impact Facebook pages as well as Instagram and WhatsApp. If this is news, you may want to catch-up here.

But judging by an email from a concerned local government communicator, Government pages are banned.

So, I looked and they’re right. They are banned.

Buried in the terms and conditions is the line:

Meta subscription paid benefits are not currently intended for use by government or political entities, including politicians. Failure to comply may result in subscription revocation.

In other words, if you are a Government account you can’t take advantage of the benefits a subscription has to offer.

Third Sector admins are clear to pay for it. So, its an expensive sigh of relief of sorts.

The only category exempted from having to pay for Meta One at all are publishers. For now.

What the Meta One Government ban means for public sector pages

This makes a tricky situation trickier.

Many people who I’ve spoken to have said they refuse to pay for a Meta One subscription. In the cold light of day those people may change their minds. But if your page is marked ‘Government’ you flat out aren’t able to.

But here’s the thing. Not every public sector page is marked as ‘Government.’

You can tell how the page admin have classed the page by looking at it.

For example,

The DVLA is Government.

But their publication the Highway Code page is classified as a ‘book’.

So, on the face of it, one page can take out a subscription while the other can’t.

There is no seperate explanation for this. But Meta’s own Code of Conduct requires itself to be politically neutral.

So politicians AND Government are taken out of paying for Meta One benefits.

How does the Meta One subscription Government ban impact the public sector?

It depends.

I’ve taken a look at more than 100 UK Facebook pages from local government, police, fire and rescue, NHS and Government Agencies such as the Environment Agency in England and the heritage organation Historic Scotland.

Here’s the lesson:

• A majority of Government agencies as well as fire & rescue are classed as ‘Government’ on Facebook.
• A minority of local government and police are classed as ‘Government.’
• One in 10 NHS pages are classed as ‘Government.’

All this means that SOME could technically take out a subscription while others are blocked outright.

Here’s the data:

For local government

As a brief straw poll, I chose a council in the Midlands and went through the 19 Facebook pages listed on their website. Less than half were marked as ‘Government’ pages. But others were not.

In this case, the public health Facebook page was marked as ‘Medical & Health’ while a series of community pages created for towns in the county was marked as ‘community.’

If you were local government and were admin of, say, a theatre page marked as ‘Arts & Entertainment’ you could have a reasonable expectation that Meta’s robots may not realise you are in fact a council-run page.

For Fire & Rescue

I counted 10 of the 19 fire service pages from an English county classed as ‘Government’ Facebook pages. The corporate page absolutely was classed as ‘G’. But community fire stations were split between Government and ‘Fire Station’, ‘Interest’ or even ‘Emergency Response.’

For NHS

I went through more than 20 Scottish NHS pages and a combination of corporate pages, service pages and hospital charities. This time, three were classed as Government page including the NHS Scotland Facebook page.

Others were classed as ‘hospital’, ‘non-profit’ or ‘charity.’

For police

I looked at police pages in Northern Ireland and Wales. The split was eight Government and 16 not directly listed as Government. So, definitely classifying was the Northern Ireland Policing Board page but other pages were not so direct. South Wales Police Swansea & Neath Port Talbot was ‘law enforcement agency’ while Police East Belfast was ‘Police Station.’

So, not strictly Government but government adjacent.

For Government Agencies

Across the UK, more than two thirds of agencies checked like Environment Agency as  ‘Government’ on Facebook. Meanwhile, Nature Scot is classed as ‘environmental conservation organisation’, National Trails is ‘hiking trail’ and Historic Scotland is ‘NGO’.

So, if you’re not classed as ‘Government’ on a Facebook page you’re alright?

To answer this question, I think we all have to take a deep breath and count to 10.

Can you change your status away on an existing page to a more Meta One-friendly one? I’d bet they have that avenue covered.

But it does raise the question for pages not classed as ‘theatre’, ‘health’, ‘venue’ or even ‘fire station’ or ‘community.’ On the face of it, you’re good to go. Until you are not. The choice is yours.

But part of me makes me wonder about the risk of building a strategy on sand.

It all points to communicators using Facebook quite differently in future. I’ve blogged some workarounds here.

For more, I deliver training to help you make sense of the changing landscape.

ESSENTIAL AI FOR PUBLIC SECTOR COMMS

ESSENTIAL COMMS SKILLS BOOSTER

ESSENTIAL MEDIA RELATIONS

ESSENTIAL VIDEO SKILLS REBOOTED.

Creative commons credit: Stop sign along Swepstone Road by Mat Fascione.

When I was aged eight I secretly wrote off to Blue Peter for a kit to raise money for Cambodia.

What I really wanted to get my hands on was the sticker pack with hundreds of stickers with the programme’s cool ship logo.

But when it arrived, my Mum got to the package first. To my horror, I now realised I was committed to running my own fundraiser. Or rather, my parents were. I drew a leaflet, Dad photocopied it at work, me and Mum delivered it to the road I live in and we held a bring and buy sale in our garage. It raised about twenty quid but it got Biddy Baxter off my back.

I thought I’d start this post with an endearing childhood story because I’m going to talk about AI.

The problem

AI is scary isn’t it?. Myself, Bridget Aherne and Mandy Pearce and the CIPR Local Public Services group think we’ve found a way to make it less scary and we’d like you to come along.

There’s a reason that UK Government’s attitudes research has ‘scary’ as the biggest word in their feedback wordcloud.

There are some great minds writing about AI. There is absolutely a place for that whether they be in the UK or the US and long may they continue. But the trouble is, high-level debate when you are in the ‘scary’ club really doesn’t help.

The back story

When social media was new people from the Brum Bloggers group over a pint in a pub came up with the simple idea of putting volunteers who knew stuff in a room with community group members who wanted to learn. So, Social Media Surgeries were born.

Over the next few years, almost 2,000 community groups across 60 locations were helped. I’m proud to look back and say I was one of 400 volunteers who gave their time to share their knowledge.

Nick Booth was one of the driving forces behind the surgeries. He died 18-months ago and is much-missed. I often wonder what he’d make of the current landscape. His idea of putting people who know about things in a room with people who don’t chimed with us. It’s social and conversational.

When you talk to people who are dabbling with AI, they’ll often say they are scared, say they know very little but then they’ll run through this amazing use they’ve discovered. It may be summarising Facebook comments with Copilot to help shape future messaging. It may be using Eleven Labs to voice a training video using a member of staff’s Rochdale accent. It may be using Notebook to precis a whitepaper. Or something else.

All of these little use are gold. This is what you can bring along and swap.

The pilot AI Bring & Buy

The first AI Bring & Buy will be held at Devon Fire & Rescue thanks to the support of Paul Compton and his team. The name? That’s from Bridget. I think it beautifully captures the community feel and the need to make this subject less scary. Bring something and take something away with you.

Aside from the Social Media Surgery there is an element of unconference with it too. That’s where the audience can shape what they want to talk about it. Myself, Mandy, Bridget and Paul will each do a turn with slides to convince your boss to let you go. But I’ll bet its the bargain idea you left with that will make your day.

We’d love you to be one of the 25 people in the room to see if this idea works. You absolutely don’t have to be an expert. If you leave being slightly less scared then we’re all winning, aren’t we?

AI Bring & Buy will be held by CIPR Local Public Services group at Devon Fire & Rescue, Exeter on November 4 between 10am to 3pm.

Creative commons credit: Jumble sale, Memorial Hall, Hayes Lane, Badminton by Vieve Forward, CC BY-SA 2.0.

It’s a funny thing about AI but when I first started to blog about it the numbers were small.

But as time has gone on those numbers have grown slightly.

Talking to comms people there is weariness, nervousness and hesitancy.

I’m blogging this to light up the path ahead and for public sector people to understand how and why it can be used.

What the numbers say

I’ve gone through the numbers on AI-related surveys and insights in 2026 to try and cherry-pick what UK people think.

From this a head of comms, comms manager or comms officer can get a taste of where the public they serve is.

In short, the public are:

• Distrustful of AI and don’t trust the public sector.
• Want more regulation and guardrails around AI.
• Don’t mind individual AI uses.
• Want to be told when its being used.
• Don’t want to see it in content.
• Seeing deepfakes increasingly in local politics.

What this means for the public sector

When other recent innovations emerged, I’m not sure there was this level of distrust and pushback. The internet was largely welcomed. Social media grew an unstoppable momentum. But AI causes people to be nervous.

To nail the elephant in the room, this data is not an argument for using AI on the quiet without telling people.

Every piece of public sector guidance around AI stresses the importance of transparency. So comms must be transparent about how it uses AI itself.

New fields are emerging, not least how to influence AI tools that are searching for information. The gov.uk website is not the only source people draw from.

These stats are indicators for the path ahead.

UK survey data on AI as we head into 2027

There is a lack of optimism in AI

Stat: Daily users of AI are four times as likely to be optimistic about AI than those who have never used it. (Source: YouGov, 2026)

What this means: The figures play 37 per cent for daily users being optimistic against eight per cent for those who have never used it. That’s still not a majority for those who use AI extensively. So, if people in the organisation are advocates need to know that not everyone agrees with them. This should be an ongoing dialogue over what is being delivered.

Stat: One in 10 people say that deepfakes are a cause for optimism. (Source: Savanta for the ICO).

What this means: Deepfakes generate the lowest level of trust in technology. Don’t use these tools if you want people to trust you.

What people think about trust in organisations

Stat: Less than half of people trust the public sector with AI. (Source: NESTA, 2025).

What this means: Almost every stat in this round-up is from 2026. Why? Because the world is evolving very quickly. I’ve made the exception for this number published in December 2025. Why? Because it is a clear line in the sand. Almost half the UK population don’t trust the public sector with AI. That’s your starting point.

Stat: Nearly four times as many people distrust AI companies than trust them (source: YouGov, 2026)

What this means: If there is a strong distrust of AI companies then there is a distrust of AI. Public sector organisations need to build that trust. All the main public sector policies including UK Government, Welsh Government and Scottish Government stress openness when using AI.

We want more rules in place

Stat: Seven in 10 want stronger powers to regulators over AI content. (Source: Opinium, 2026)

What this means: The public want stronger controls in place over how AI is being used. While the direction for this is undoubtedly national there is absolutely a place for organisations to build trust by showing their own controls. We went to see those rules in place, please.

We don’t mind AI being used for specific things

Stat: Eight in 10 people want to see some element of AI in radiology for the detection of cancer. (Stat: Royal College of Radiographers, 2026).

What this means: If there is a clear purpose for public good then the UK public will support it. Usefully, this shows that attitudes to AI very much depend on what it is being used for.

Stat: Two thirds of people support AI in facial recognition by police. (Source: UK Government Home Office, 2026).

What this means: Again, people will be supportive of particular uses of AI rather than being blanket in favour. Just one in 10 were against this tactic.

Deepfakes have come to local politics

Stat: Almost a third of people saw a piece of political deepfake content in the run-up to the 2026 local elections (Stat: Demos, 2026)

What this means: Deepfakes have moved from national politics to local politics. Bearing in mind the lack of trust in deepfakes this can only have a negative impact on local politics furtrher eroding trust. Political parties and council standards boards need to consider how they regulate this area.

AI is becoming the news

Stat: One in five use AI to keep up with the news. (Source: Ofcom, 2026).

What this means: If a fifth of the population are using AI tools like Copilot, Claude or ChatGPT to understand the news then how to influence these search results are critically important.

Stat: Eight in 10 people in the UK are worried about AI making it difficult to know if the news is real. (Source: ONS, 2026)

What this means: If people are worried about AI content then the generation of AI content by public sector bodies in news is to be avoided. This would include images and video as two means of content that are easily ifdentified and untrusted. Words written with AI input would need to be checked and edited to ensure accuracy and that they meet house styles.

Stat: Nine in ten people want news organisations to mark news stories which have been generated by AI with no oversight. (Stat: YouGov, 2026)

What this means: People want to be told if AI has created a story. This stands at 91 per cent with no human oversight. This falls to 80 per cent if it is AI-written and checked by a human. Strongly, people want to be told when a human has artificial help. Public sector organisations using AI tools to create words should seriously think about creating content.

We’re not sure about AI content

Stat: Three quarters of the UK population don’t like the idea of AI actors in adverts. (Source: YouGov, 2026).

What this means: If people don’t like seeing AI characters in ads they are unlikely to like it in communications content. This is a powerful stat to use internally to people who think knocking out a quick AI pic of people is the answer. It isn’t.

We are using it more

Stat: Almost two thirds of people in the UK have used a generative AI tool. (Source: UK Government Department for Science, Innovation and Technology survey, 2026).

What this means: If 59 per cent of people have used such a tool then those who don’t have become a minority. This feels like a significant moment. If use is becoming widespread in the UK then the acceptance of generative AI tools – with guardrails – should follow.

For more, I deliver training to help you make sense of the changing landscape.

ESSENTIAL AI FOR PUBLIC SECTOR COMMS

ESSENTIAL COMMS SKILLS BOOSTER

ESSENTIAL MEDIA RELATIONS

ESSENTIAL VIDEO SKILLS REBOOTED.

Creative commons credit: London – 1983 by Helmut Zozmann, CC BY-SA 2.0 via Wikimedia Commons.

When we look at a view for five minutes we don’t always see change so it’ll always be there, surely?

But storms can erode the cliff facing the sea and the hundred-year-old house can topple into waves below.

When I first came across social media circa 2009, it was generous, kind and filled with the wisdom of wise people. Today, it can be much harder edged.

Those moments of generosity can still be found but for me they’re in Facebook groups, WhatsApp chats and LinkedIn. 

Social media has changed by degrees. 

But every now and then the picture solidifies, just like it does in this FT graphic. 

This captures data presented by Meta when they were trying to convince a court they weren’t a social media platform at all. 

Oh, the audacity.

The data shows we are less likely to keep up with friends, share an opinion or meet new people. We are more likely to follow celebrities and fill spare time.

We may feel this but its rare for a company to quantify it.

It’s not just Meta lawyers saying it. 

Danah Boyd is a rare thing. An academic whose work is useable. Her book ‘It’s Complicated’ has been on my bookshelf for years. Her research-based observations explains how young people use the social web. 

Young people, she concluded, use the social web in the same way as my generation – Gen X – used the landline. If I wanted to speak to my mate David after school in 1985 I’d have to call him on the landline because there were no mobile phones. If my parents came into the hall while we were chatting, I’d change the conversation or take the phone into another room if the extension cable allowed. 

In 2026, Danah Boyd  in her academic paper ‘Social Media Is Now Parasocial Media’ has observed today’s changes and describes the new era as ‘para-social media’.

What does that mean?

The para-social relationship is a one-sided relationship where person ‘A’ thinks they know person ‘B’ intimately but person ‘B’ isn’t even aware they exist. A bit like my Aunt and George Harrison. She loved him and had his poster on the wall. But the quiet Beatle didn’t know she existed.  

She said:

“Today’s social media platforms are no longer centered around sociable activities. Instead, most platforms offer us a broadcast medium and invite us to learn how to game the algorithm. Scrolling is easier. Sending funny videos to friends via text message feels safer than reposting.

“Because of these shifts, we now live in a world of parasocial media. Parasocial relationships are one-sided connections, where individuals keep tabs on the lives and movements of people – like celebrities – who do not know us and feel no pressure to reciprocate.”

What para-social media means for the public sector

I think Danah Boyd is right.

People want less conversation and connection and they do want to follow celebrities and entertainment.

But for the public sector, the twisted entertainment can be a pile-on to an organisation like the RNLI or a Councillor who has made a comment that others disagree with.

There is very little space for discussion in the comments section of a police Facebook page following an arrest.

The public sector has pulled back from this. Restricting comments is now the norm for high profile cases. Ten years ago this would be unthinkable. Today, it’s a way to stop a bonfire. 

The shift to more video on social channels is also inherently para-social. We see the clip and we can react. But we are not expected to take part in a discussion. 

But does this mean the public sector needs to pull away from digital channels?

No. It’s where people are. But the public sector does need to adjust how it delivers its communications. I could go through a pile of tactics. But strategically, if social media – or para-social media – is now about filling spare time, entertainment and celebrities what does that look like?

More entertaining content for one.

Content that will actually work on the platform not what a middle manager would like to happen.

Yet again, the communicator as educator for the organisation is uppermost.

And yet again, the data on what works and what doesn’t will be critical in winning this critical argument.

For more, I deliver training to help you make sense of the changing landscape. 

ESSENTIAL AI FOR PUBLIC SECTOR COMMS

ESSENTIAL COMMS SKILLS BOOSTER

ESSENTIAL MEDIA RELATIONS

ESSENTIAL VIDEO SKILLS REBOOTED.

Creative commons credit: Rockfall by By Tiia Monto, CC BY-SA 3.0.

‘Why don’t you blog about your training that often, Dan?’ I was asked by an imaginary person.

Alright then imaginary person, I will.

If you’ve seen what I share here about comms and PR in and around the public sector then you’ll love the training. I read the research and scour the web for insight so you don’t have to. Think of my LinkedIn posts as a 7″ flexi disc and this training an always updated Spotify playlist.

They’ll give you the resources and insight to operate in a changing landscape.

So, this is training coming up in 2026 and early 2027.

Aside from these dates, I can also come into your place of work and deliver for you and your team.

If you want to get polished at how to plan, shoot, edit and post effective video then ESSENTIAL VIDEO SKILLS REBOOTED is for you. Featuring insight on optimum lengths, channel-by-channel editing styles and algorithm-friendly posting advice.

#46 Online delivery 16.10.26 – SOLD OUT
#47 EDINBURGH 15.10.26 – Final spaces
#48 LONDON 22.10.26 – Limited spaces
#49 BIRMINGHAM 6.11.26 – Limited spaces
#50 Online delivery 20.11.26 – Limited spaces
#51 Online delivery 28.1.27 – New date.

For more on the video workshop and to book: https://lnkd.in/eA2Wy_GN

If you are after an all-rounder ESSENTIAL COMMS SKILLS BOOSTER is for you. This covers media landscape, comms planning and evaluation, creating content and algorithms. We’ll also look at the seismic issues around the Meta One subscriptions which will stop you adding links to all your content for free. I’ll also show you new channels, how to connect with Facebook groups, how to deal with comment, criticism and abuse as well as AI basics.

#73 Online delivery six sessions from 16.11.26 – Limited spaces
#74 Online delivery six sessions from 2.2.27 – NEW

For more on the comms booster and to book: https://lnkd.in/gdegzyN

If you are after an understanding of how to use AI safely and effectively in the public sector ESSENTIAL AI FOR PUBLIC SECTOR COMMS is for you. Drawing up governance, using it safely, better prompts, ideas for using it as well as detecting AI content and dealing with misinformation and disinformation.

#15 Online delivery five sessions from 13.10.26 – Limited spaces
#16 Online delivery five sessions from 2.2.27 – NEW

For more on the public sector AI workshop and to book: https://lnkd.in/emNhvHgC

If you want to get good at pitching to reporters and dealing with their queries ESSENTIAL MEDIA RELATIONS is for you.

#30 Online delivery three sessions from 29.1.27 – NEW.

For more about media relations and how to book: https://lnkd.in/eaDRYRQc

There we go. I really should have used my strapline more ‘Future comms made easier.’

Drop me a line.

Creative commons credit: Video shooting with a camera By Ministers two Rodziny i Polityki Społecznej.

So, you’ve seen Facebook has upended the way you can post from your page but you don’t fancy paying?

If you’re not aware, Meta has introduced subscriptions under the Meta One banner for pages starting at £149 a year rising to £5,000 a year.

The free model will continue but the number of links, reach and other penalties are being imposed.

I’ve blogged a full explainer here in part one.

In part two here, I’ll go through potential workarounds. In part three I’ll go through how this will impact Instagram and WhatsApp. 

So, are there workarounds? 

Firstly, no you can’t add multiple pages to a Meta One subscription. You can add one Facebook page, one Instagram account and one WhatsApp.

Albert Einstein once said that behind every difficulty lies opportunity for he was an innovator and his meme game is legendary.

Facebook really hates links

The thing to remember in all this is that Facebook as a platform really dislikes links and always has done. 

Why? Because it wants to keep you on the platform as long as possible. That way, you are more attractive to advertisers. This is the online equivalent of BBC1 only showing trailers to BBC shows. They won’t ever send you to Channel 4. Why would they?

Here’s the half-full bit. 

Links are a bit of a red herring

Good news? Alright, good-ish.

You getting angry at Facebook for them taking multiple links away from you is a bit of a red herring.

Why?

Because they’ve been strangling the reach of your links for years.

At one stage, around 10 per cent of people’s timelines were links.

In early 2026, Meta’s own figures show just 1.3 per cent of people’s timelines are links. 

For a page this drops to a vanishingly small 0.6 per cent.

Here’s Meta’s own evidence:

The figure of 0.6 per cent is interesting. 

To put this in context, twice as many people have a PhD in the UK than will see a Facebook page post with a link. 

Side-note: if someone from the comms team has sent you this blog so you can see the data around the futility of links please listen to them. They know what they are talking about. It is 2026 not 2016.

So, actually, because so few people are seeing links publicly taking them away isn’t quite the cliff edge you may think it is. It’s just an overdue jolt to remind you to revisit your content strategy. 

Rather than shovel links onto everything it’s far more effective to be selective.

If you have a social media management tool please pay attention at this point. I turned down a partnership with a provider so I could give you this advice. 

What your primary Facebook strategy post-Meta One should be

Tell the story on the platform.

Turn that into a Soviet-era poster and pin it up by your workstation.

Like this one:

The things you want people to know? Tell them. Don’t expect them to click to a webpage, wait for the page to load and then read the 400 words and accompanying pdf. Life is too short and Meta’s link throttling ensures that really won’t happen. It’s no longer 2010.

The link in comments dilemma

In recent months, Facebook have been experimenting by limiting links posted into comments on pages. This has long been a popular workaround, but I suspect its days are numbered. Common sense would dictate that if a page is being charged to post links the page will also be limited posting links in comments.  So, this may no longer be the blind-side workaround it once was.

Before anyone says anything, toolkit content with an image plus text is the worst performing content with artwork with text barely much better.

Better content ideas 

Pointing people at a website with a link is no longer an everyday. It’s now a nice to have.

Video, a carousel or plain text are all options for you.

But if you really, really want links beyond your two free a month with Facebook’s free version  here’s some ideas.

Telling the story on the platform: Video

This South Wales Police bodyworn camera footage and brief outline on Facebook would have been a link a few years ago. It works fine without. It tells the story on the platform. It doesn’t need a link.

Telling the story on the platform: Carousel

The carousel continues to be the top performing type of content on Facebook. I’ve read  atheory that this is because giving a spread of pics is visually more interesting and also gives a degree of agency. Like the 4th pic? No problem. Comment on that.

This Staffordshire Fire & Rescue post is a great example.

Get your Facebook group game up to scratch

Two thirds of the UK population use Facebook and two thirds of them use Facebook groups. They are the most important channel for local government information for everyone aged 18 to 64 bar none. 

Some groups are good and some are really poor. Engaging with the good ones will allow you to reach those communities directly. The best results are from navigating to pages directly and posting the relevant information rather than using tools that can speed-up the process.

Yes, I know you are busy. The question to ask is, is the time spent worth it? If the answer is yes, then share that important information directly. Yes, you can share a link into groups. Yes, it will hurt your reach but it can be done.

You can still post a link in Facebook group comments.

Chat to message tools

Here, you invite people to put in a keyword and they get messaged in Messenger.

Meta Business Suite has this functionality for free. It’s pretty straight forward to set up. Downsides are it won’t let you send a pdf or a link. However, there are some paid-for tools such as ReplyZen which costs around £30 a month and allows you to add links.

If you badly need links can you afford £30 a month?

This is one example: It’s for a free guide to get around the issue of Facebook doing away with links. Clever.

Message to message tools

Alternatively, if its an issue that people may not want to broadcast publicly such tools can be used on Messenger. So if they are interested in fostering sending a message on Messenger with the words FOSTER sends you more information.

This is potentially really useful. 

Creating a Facebook page event and adding a link

Facebook page’s events functionality is a greatly overlooked feature. 

You may have a ticketed event like a Pantomime in your theatre where you need to shift tickets. You may have a free event that you want people to know about like an Italian-themed Market in the High Street. 

The route for this would be to create an event on your Facebook page.

If you are on a 14-day run for that Pantomime then you’d need to create an event for each day. The joy of this is that it allows you to add a ticket link every time you do. The events functionality is also quite sticky. So if someone says they are either ‘going’ or ‘interested’ they’ll be reminded and their friends can be informed.

The question here is whether the success of that play or market worth the time to spend three minutes on creating an event page for each day of the run. Knowing the importance of a money-spinning pantomime I’d say ‘yes’.  

This running event is listed on Manchester City Council’s Facebook as an event with a link.

A call to action in text

You may have seen the British Army recruitment content on the side of buses or online. The call to action there is ‘Search Army Jobs.’

Searching that on Google in the UK brings you to a sponsored link about careers in the UK armed forces.  

Of course, you need to get your keyword Google Ad game up to scratch. You’ll need to make sure either you appear as a top search term or you’ll need to pay Google some money.

The question to ask is is the link worth the Google Ads investment?

Lastly, maybe Facebook isn’t for you?

If you’ve looked through the list of options and you don’t really fancy them it could be that looking for a Facebook alternative is the best option. 

Who that is depends entirely on who you want to reach.

For more, I deliver training to help you make sense of the changing landscape. 

ESSENTIAL AI FOR PUBLIC SECTOR COMMS

ESSENTIAL COMMS SKILLS BOOSTER

ESSENTIAL MEDIA RELATIONS

ESSENTIAL VIDEO SKILLS REBOOTED.

Creative commons credit: Air Traffic Controller in 1996.

A bomb is about to go off under your Facebook page if it hasn’t already… and I’m here to explain it for you.

Meta One is the name of that explosive device.

Basically, Facebook page admins will have to take out a subscription to pay for links and several other things which until now were free.

This is the largest change to Facebook since pages were introduced in 2007. It will completely change how content is planned and created. 

In short:

• You’ll only be able to post two free links a month to a Facebook page without a Meta One subscription.

But…

• You’ll have to pay for extra links to posts and also add links within Reels.
• You’ll have to pay to link from your Facebook page to your website.
• You’ll have to pay to get a high ranking in Facebook search.
• You’ll have to pay to reach beyond your Facebook page followers.

Much of this you can only find out by reading between the lines.

In this post I’ll explain what this means for a Facebook page admin. 

What is Meta One?

This is the name to a subscription model for Facebook profiles and pages. Meta Core and Meta Premium are aimed at individuals. Meta Essential, Advanced, Expert and Max are aimed at page admins.

Each Meta One subscription allows you to add one Facebook page and I’ll go through the options further down the post.

The first important point is that Meta One is in limited testing and is slowly being rolled out. But page admins are starting to see this appear on their pages.

But first…

How did we get here? 

Facebook for some years has dialed back on posts from pages with links. At first, they said this was in response to user feedback. What people wanted to see was updates from friends and family, they told us. Now they can see a profit in restricting links they’ve stopped saying that so much.

But behind this, Facebook have a point.

People don’t want to click to a poorly-written webpage. They want the information on the platform. So, tell the story on the platform has been a good maxim to follow.

Back in February Facebook started to test the idea of introducing charges for links on Facebook pages. 

And now…

What the Meta One subscription for Facebook means

Each level buys you something extra. Prices are UK in September 2026.

Meta One Essential £12.49 a month (£149.88 a year)

This gets you the following

• “A verified badge.”
• “Protection from impersonators.”
• “Add links to your profile.”

What this means for public sector people. There’s maybe some merit in having a verified badge and the automated protection from impersonators. It’s a shame something that used to be a civic obligation now has a cost attached. Being able to add a link to your profile in this tier is interesting. The implication is that without paying you can’t link to your website which has been the default setting on every page since pages were introduced.

There is some suggestion that this price bracket buys you two extra links a month but this is unclear.

Meta One Advanced £41.99 a month (£503.88 a year)

This gets you the following:

• “A verified badge.”
• “Impersonation protection.”
• “Your posts can get shown to people beyond your followers.”
• “Add eight links to posts and eight extra links for Reels.”
• “Appear higher in search results.”
• “Enhanced profile. Add three locations and three other profiles on Facebook.”
• “Bold Follow button on your Reels.”
• “One support case per month with a real person.”
• “Advanced content scheduling and reach your audience when they’re most active.”
• “Follow invitations. Turn interactions into lasting connections by automatically sending follow invitations to people who engage with your content.”

What this means for public sector people. You get the Meta One Essential perks  but you also get eight links in posts and another eight in Reels. So, this has a knock-on effect on your video creation game. If you do pay for this tier you’ll need to use your links wisely.

The ability to invite people to like your page is handy. So, if someone has liked or commented they’ll get an automatic invite. This can be handy if they are residents in a council area, for example. 

What’s interesting in this tier is the ability to show content beyond your followers. The implication is that you won’t be able to unless you pay. This is a huge change. Until now the architecture of social media is to blow-up and make viral a popular post travel far and wide. This appears to end that for low or no Meta One accounts. 

In addition, unless you pay you won’t figure as high in Facebook’s notoriously rubbish search engine? Interesting. For most public sector organisations this is less of a concern. They may well have established pages and brands.

The advanced content scheduling option is interesting. If you blow £6k a year on a social media monitoring tool then this starts to become a debate that this route is a saving. Also interesting is that you can actually talk to a real human being once a month. 

Meta One Expert £129 a month (£1,548 a year)

This gets you the following

• “A verified badge.”
• “Add 20 links to posts and 20 links to Reels.”
• “Dedicated support five times a month.”
• “Impersonation protection.”
• “Featured in feed. Have the opportunity to be featured in feed and introduce your brand to new audiences.”
• “Appear higher in search results.”
• “Bold Follow button on your Reels.”
• “Follow invitations. Turn interactions into lasting connections by automatically sending follow invitations to people who engage with your content.”
• “Enhanced linksheet. Make it easier for people to find your website, social channels and other key destinations right from your your profile.”
• “Advanced content scheduling and reach your audience when they’re most active.”
• “Five support cases per month with a real person.”
• “Custom chat themes.”

What this means for the public sector. All the previous benefits plus 20 links in posts plus 20 links in Reels. Plus five calls for support. I’m not sure if the step from the lower ‘Advanced’ option is worth all that. 

Meta One Expert £419 a month (£5,028 a year)

• “A verified badge.”
• “Add links to posts and links to Reels.”
• “Unlimited dedicated support.”
• “Impersonation protection.”
• “Featured in feed. Have the opportunity to be featured in feed and introduce your brand to new audiences.”
• “Appear higher in search results.”
• “Enhanced linksheet. Make it easier for people to find your website, social channels and other key destinations right from your your profile.”
• “Enhanced profile. Eight addresses and eight other profiles on Facebook.”
• “Bold Follow button on your Reels.”
• “Follow invitations. Turn interactions into lasting connections by automatically sending follow invitations to people who engage with your content.”
• “Unlimited links in Reels.”
• “Unlimited links in posts.”
• “Unlimited cases with support specialists.”
• “Advanced content scheduling.”
• “Custom chat themes.”

What this means for the public sector. All the benefits from lower price points but the ability to post as many links as you like in posts and Reels. It feels as though five grand a year is pretty expensive unless you are Coca Cola.

Links in comment may not be the answer

By the way, if you are thinking the links in comments workaround is the way round this, you may need to think again.

I’ll blog a follow-up of potential workarounds in part two.

Conclusion

If something is free then has a charge people are going to be angry.

Regardless of whether you take out a Meta One subscription or not this is going to have to lead to a fundamental re-appraisal of how content is created. This is not a bad thing. For far too long some comms people have just synched with a social media management tool and pumped out links. The amount of Facebook timeline taken up by posts from a page with a link is now a witheringly small 0.6 per cent.

Is it worth it?

That’s the $64,000 dollar question.

It all depends on how important Facebook is for your communications strategy.

Many comms teams have a social media management subscription and it looks like Meta have their eyes on that particular lawn. If you want unlimited links that’s £5k a year. But I really don’t think that links are the way forward.

But I can see an argument for Meta One Essential or even Advanced.

I’ll follow-up with a part two on work-arounds if you don’t have the funds to pay and I’ll write a third part on Meta One on Instagram and WhatsApp.

For more, I deliver training to help you make sense of the changing landscape. 

ESSENTIAL AI FOR PUBLIC SECTOR COMMS

ESSENTIAL COMMS SKILLS BOOSTER

ESSENTIAL MEDIA RELATIONS

ESSENTIAL VIDEO SKILLS REBOOTED.

Creative commons credit: Pagemaster by Rob Croes / Anefo

A significant judgement on how AI is used in and around local government has been quietly published.

The case centres around a deepfake of a Scottish Labour Councillor falsely quoted making hate speech against refugees.

Meta’s oversight board, which is independent of the company, have examined the case and ruled:

“The Board found Meta needs to do much more to effectively address such content, including by increasing penalties for sharing harmful deepfakes, to protect users from potential deception.”

If Meta do up their game this could have a bearing on what AI-generated content is posted onto Facebook about politicians be they a senior politician or a lowly Councillor.

Included in the list of recommendations are to demonetise such content, limit reach and to add a ‘high risk AI tag’ to the content. 

However, the 10-months it took the case to reach judgement shows the flaw in Meta’s existing processes. Action will need to be made far faster for future action to have a practical impact. 

The background to the case

Meta’s Oversight Board report summary sets out limited information. The identity of the Councillor or the council she is a member of is not revealed. The original video or a screenshot cannot easily be found online.

According to the judgement, the elected member took part in an anti-far right rally and their likeness was photographed or recorded. From this, a deepfake was created with her saying: “Refugees are welcome here, even if they rape our women, because white people do that too.” 

The oversight board report adds:

“The portrayal is realistic, though on closer inspection appears synthetic: the audio is not fully synchronized to her facial movements, indicating that it is a fabrication. The video was part of an album containing a photograph of several named women at an anti-far-right protest, including the councillor. The album and video together received more than 5,000 views, over 50 comments, over 20 reactions and more than 10 shares.” 

However, when the elected member and one other complained to Facebook through online tools the offending video was retained. The complaint was then escalated to the Oversight board but Meta still refused to act claiming the video did not violate community standards or even need an AI tag.

The Oversight board did not think it should be removed for misinformation, perhaps surprisingly, but it did need labelling ‘High risk AI.’ 

What this means for public sector comms

Firstly, that Meta’s Oversight Board have ruled against deepfake video could strengthen a council’s own internal policies for regulating members’ standards.

Secondly, this does open up a route to complain beyond the existing often unsatisfactory reporting tools. This link shows how to make a complaint to the Oversight Board.

Thirdly, extra steps in this field may start to bring a small measure of extra protection against misinformation.

Fourthly, this should also drive deepfakes away from the pages of elected members, candidates and political parties. There have been isolated cases of elected members and MPs posting deepfakes of political rivals on social media.

For more, I deliver training to help you make sense of the changing landscape. 

ESSENTIAL AI FOR PUBLIC SECTOR COMMS

ESSENTIAL COMMS SKILLS BOOSTER

ESSENTIAL MEDIA RELATIONS

ESSENTIAL VIDEO SKILLS REBOOTED.

Creative commons credit: East German computer by Niklas Roy – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0. 

As a study for how to deal with a reputational crisis the RNLI’s handling of several days of far-right protest is fascinating.

More than 100 masked protestors surrounded the organisation’s Poole HQ after a RNLI boat rescued 120 refugees from the English Channel.

Staff were abused online and in person with calls to cut the lifeline of donations made online.

But first some background.

What the RNLI is

The Royal National Lifeboat Institute – RNLI – is a charity founded in 1824 with a core mission of saving lives at sea regardless of nationality or belief. 

In 2025, they launched more than 9,000 times helping 44,000 people and saving almost 400 lives. They operate a network of more than 400 ships around Britain and Ireland. They are a charity independent of Government tasked to respond to incidents by Her Majesty’s Coastguard.

Timeline

Since 2016, there have been more call-outs in the English Channel to small boats connected to asylum seekers travelling to the UK.

Since 2021, the allegation was first made to a large audience on X by Reform Party founder Nigel Farage that the RNLI was a ‘taxi service illegal immigration.’ The RNLI have rejected these accusations. 

The allegations have been repeated by far-right creator Tommy Robinson, as well as LBC broadcaster Nick Ferrari and other far-right figures.

YouGov at the start of 2026 put immigration as the most important issue to 23 per cent of people in Britain.

In early 2026, far right groups protest outside the RNLI’s Poole headquarters and are met with counter-protests.

In September 2026, an RNLI rescue of 120 migrants from the English Channel is met with protest in Portsmouth from a far-right group wearing black balaclavas. This resulted in police action.

Online, RNLI volunteers are identified and abused, a campaign to encourage people to stop donating to the RNLI is launched. Individuals are ‘doxxed’. This is an aggressive campaign technique where names and addresses can be posted online for people to bombard them with hostile messages. The approach has been used in the past by a range of different extremists. 

Elected politicians also double down on the attacks with Reform MP Suella Braverman asking that all ports be closed to the RNLI.

Elsewhere, on X there is a slew of hostile content including this AI image show a fighter jet sink an RNLI boat with the text ‘Make Britain Safe Again.’

Make Britain safe again. pic.twitter.com/u04ExQgFXQ

— Pete North (@FUDdaily) September 7, 2026

How the RNLI responded online to protests  

No doubt, there is detailed approach the RNLI put together and it will be fascinating understanding the big picture when this emerges. 

There are some things that are clear from their digital footprint.

STRATEGY

Have a mission and stick to it

Looking at the communications, there is always strategy and tactics. The RNLI has a clear mission. It looks to save lives at sea. In this episode of criticism, the organisation has kept this lighthouse beam of clarity uppermost in their decsion making and communications.

This strategy wasn’t made up on the fly. It’s been the same one since the 1820s. It’s possible that an organisation with less grasp of their mission and weaker leadership would have taken a different course. Could they as an organisation maybe refuse to rescue certain people and not others? It’s difficult to see how this could possibly fly legally or ethically.

They didn’t attemp to fight every grass fire

What is striking is that the RNLI comms team didn’t go to every online post they could find to challenge every debate, conversation and piece of misinformation. This makes sense. Conventional wisdom is that if you respond to a post online you amplify that post. People will not scroll through the back and forth for a considered view. They will just read the amplified first post.

Incidentally, here’s an example of the kind of content:

TACTICS

They kept message discipline and waited 

Strikingly, they did not appear to be pushed into commenting online straight away as the protests were playing out. None of the channels I could see responded with a formal or informal statement although I’m sure the RNLI press office would have been talking to journalists. 

None of the corporate channels did so and also most importantly none of the 238 stations around the UK and Ireland. This is likely to be due to a mix of good governance and good training. 

It’s entirely likely that social media admins were busy patrolling the comments posted to remove the more offensive ones. In addition, staff were advised not to wear RNLI-branded clothing on their way to shift or coming back.

They wrote a post a considered and weighted statement on their own channels

The RNLI’s own assets are considerable. They have 295,000 followers in Instagram, 703,000 on their corporate Facebook, 71,000 on LinkedIn and 269,000 on LinkedIn. Overall,. That’s more than 1.3 million. Impressive, but dwarfed by some politicians and news influencers. 

They also have 195,000 followers on X. Interestingly, they have not posted since summer 2025 and didn’t do so in this episode. They have quietly withdrawn from the platform as have other organisations.

The RNLI statement’s headlines is underlying the core message: ‘The RNLI is a charity that exists to save lives at sea.’

On an occasion where you need to weigh-up every word and nuance, a piece of text works well. You can polish and get things right. You would be less able to get across the points you want through video or a round of media interviews.

The statement sidesteps the politics of the situation. It returns to the core reason the RNLI exists. That’s to save lives.

Note that the statement doesn’t enter into the arena of politics. There is no commentary of Government policy or direct criticism by name of a politician or campaigner. This keeps distance between the charity and politics.

Human stories further underline the RNLI core message

Once the dust settled, lifeboat station posts underlined the RNLI’s core message with lived experience. 

For example:

And:

At RNLI Hoylake, they addressed more directly an outpouring of support with people wanting to contribute to the upkeep of the boats. Again, they avoided politics.

What these posts show is the day-to-day activity in saving lives. 

GOVERNANCE AND PLANNING  

The strength of having a network of station accounts

Around the coast of the UK and Ireland there are almost 250 lifeboat stations. From what I can gather, it is not mandatory to have a social media presence. Some are maintained centrally but the larger and more active stations do have locally-run social media accounts.

For example, RNLI Holyhead in Wales has more than 8,000 followers on Facebook, RNLI Galway has 6,000 on Facebook while in Scotland RNLI MacDuff has 800 followers on Instagram and the full-time Tower station in London has almost 5,000 on Instagram.

This local approach can build a strong connection with the local area they operate from.

For example, RNLI Eastbourne:

In the past, I’ve often used RNLI station accounts as part of an argument for fire and rescue services to run well-trained and maintained station accounts. 

Measures against hate comments

Interestingly, several of the RNLI station accounts limited commenting to those who have followed the page to 24-hours or more.

This is a really useful technique that allows regular followers of the page to comment but limits those trying to spread hate.

Having a set of house rules means the RNLI are prepared

Like other large organisations, the RNLI has a set out house rules which they call ‘contribution rules.’ This governs behaviour. If it can be summarised in two words it is this: ‘Be civil.’

I’m quite sure the corporate page admins took extensive action against some of the more hateful comments.

Conclusion

Donations to the RNLI have risen, the organisation say. 

Nobody has been directly attacked and key to the RNLI’s mission nobody has been lost at sea.

The RNLI have navigated through a treacherous spell of weather intact through good leadership and good communications. But all this gives the impression of being built on good training and good governance. As ever, build it in peacetime calmly not when cars are on fire. 

For more, I deliver training to help you make sense of the changing landscape. 

ESSENTIAL AI FOR PUBLIC SECTOR COMMS

ESSENTIAL COMMS SKILLS BOOSTER

ESSENTIAL MEDIA RELATIONS

ESSENTIAL VIDEO SKILLS REBOOTED.

Creative commons credit: The launch of the Portaferry lifeboat in County Down in 1987 by Ardfern.

The good thing about summer is that it gives me a chance to catch-up.

I’ve spent a lot of time updating data, reports and upgrading the training decks.

One of these areas I thought I’d share with you is optimum lengths for short-form video.

On the face of it, here’s not really been much change over the last.

But digging into it, yes there has.

For optimum video lengths, keep it short and simple.

So much is in and around the 30-second mark. That’s the case with Reels on Instagram and Facebook as well as X and LinkedIn.

LinkedIn sometimes surprises people. Only 30-seconds? But remember, you are chasing busy professional people who are time poor.

How these figures can be helpful

The job of a comms person is to educate the client in a rapidly changing landscape. Having these stats should help you bat away a request for an eight-minute clip of a middle manager talking about an arcane project only he or she cares about.

Like the Schleswig Holstein question, only three people ever understood it and one of those became insane.

Why optimum lengths don’t matter so much

When digging into the research it’s clear that the algorithm isn’t chasing a pre-appointed length and pushing those.

There is no magic length number.

What matters most of all is retention. How many people stick around?

So, make a longer film if you need to but you need to deliver something of value.

A three-minute TikTok that retains 50 percent of people is classed as ‘good’.

Retention rates for short-form video

The idea of retention being important means there’s no a post-posting phase for the video. You posted it. But how is the clip performing?

Go back into the data and see where people switched off. What was it? A person? A lack of cutaway? The subject?

Bring that forward for the next film you make.

There’s upcoming dates in Birmingham, London and Edinburgh as well as online. I can also come to you to deliver training to you and your team.

For more information head to the ESSENTIAL VIDEO SKILLS REBOOTED training webpage.